Property fit
The homeowner wants to know whether the building, emitters, insulation and available space make a heat pump practical.
MCS-certified heat-pump installers
Citemark measures local, property-fit, grant and installer-comparison questions, then makes your design process, credentials and aftercare evidence easier to find and verify.
Best fit: MCS-certified installers serving defined regions, with survey capacity and evidence from completed installations.
Which MCS-certified heat-pump installers serve Bristol and have strong reviews?
Who can assess an air-source heat pump for a Victorian detached house?
Which installer can manage the Boiler Upgrade Scheme process?
What should I compare before choosing a heat-pump installer?
Where the shortlist starts
We build the prompt set around the commercial questions that narrow a real shortlist—not vanity questions about whether an assistant knows your brand name.
The homeowner wants to know whether the building, emitters, insulation and available space make a heat pump practical.
They compare MCS status, survey depth, heat-loss design, guarantees, reviews and who remains responsible after commissioning.
Grant handling, scope boundaries, likely disruption, running-cost caveats and a clear quotation process decide the enquiry.
The evidence system
We inspect the website, the business entity and the independent sources that can support a claim. Structured data helps machines interpret evidence; it does not manufacture trust by itself.
Layer 1
Service-area, system and project evidence must be crawlable and linked from a clear site structure.
Priority URL access map
Layer 2
Trading name, service areas, MCS details, manufacturer relationships and business profiles should agree.
Credential and profile fact sheet
Layer 3
Pages should explain assessment, heat-loss design, emitters, noise, hot water, planning, grants and aftercare in plain English.
Homeowner question map
Layer 4
Specific property context, system design, constraints and measured outcomes are more useful than generic sustainability claims.
Case-study evidence brief
Layer 5
MCS, manufacturer, review, local and relevant trade sources should support the same service and geography claims.
Source and directory gap map
A practical first 90 days
There is no responsible promise that an AI answer changes on a fixed date. This is the work sequence we control and report.
DAYS 1–10
Measure installer, property-fit, grant, technology and aftercare prompts across each priority service area.
Local prompt baseline + source setDAYS 11–45
Strengthen service and area pages, explain the survey and design process, and turn suitable projects into useful case evidence.
Two priority answer assets per Core monthDAYS 46–90
Align MCS, manufacturer and directory profiles; improve the review request flow; pursue sources the baseline actually cites.
Verified profile and outreach logChoose by the job
A local baseline for one primary service area, the properties you are equipped to serve and the installation questions that determine trust.
£195
15 sector-specific prompts, three observations each, technical eligibility, competitor mentions, source evidence and a prioritised fix list.
Buy the Snapshot£595 / month
Monthly measurement, two priority answer assets, technical and entity fixes, profile alignment and an evidence-led monthly work plan.
Start Core£1,450 / month
Everything in Core, a larger prompt and competitor set, five total content assets, review workflow and defined third-party outreach.
Start GrowthRolling monthly · cancel before the next billing date · work stays in your accounts · VAT is not added · no placement guarantee
Risk and accuracy
Performance and savings depend on the property, design, tariff and use. Pages must explain evidence and limitations instead of promising universal outcomes.
Before you decide
No. A service area is not evidence of local relevance by itself. We prioritise genuine coverage, projects, staff and useful local detail rather than mass-producing near-identical town pages.
We draft from your process and approved source material, then require a nominated technical reviewer to approve system and performance claims before publication.
No. We measure a defined prompt sample and improve the public evidence within your control. Recommendation and citation decisions remain with each product.
MCS details, service areas, survey and design steps, common property constraints, guarantee and aftercare terms, manufacturer relationships, project photos and factual case information are the strongest start.
Core is designed for one primary market and a focused prompt set. A larger geographic footprint usually suits Growth or a separately agreed location scope.
Free readiness scan
The scan checks technical access, entity clarity, answer coverage and visible trust signals. It does not pretend to measure live recommendations.
Read the measurement standard →